Since To arrange it is the process by which parts with different interests they reach agreements with which they are committed. We can watch with attention that one definition and to find some elements interesting: the agreement must be understood like a process or step by step, a sequence through which it is arrived towards that it is the joint decision. The other element is that in her several parts participate, understanding to the parts like people, who can be present for a reason or purpose individual or representing some institution or organization. Finally, another key element of the presented/displayed definition is the objective of the agreement, that it has to do with obtaining agreements or decisions common. The agreement processes are used generally in the organizations to surpass moments of crisis and of points distant differentials between the parts, in nonexentos difficult surroundings of complex situations in the interpersonal relations, making that the people who lead these processes have abilities for the handling of the conflict and the one necessary of its proactive direction. The agreement does not neutralize and solves the conflicts of automatic way, rather aspires to that the parts have a discussion, knows its duties, their rights and assumes commitments.

In this point usually it appears the debate if the agreement is means or an aim. To our way to see it can be the two things: means because it implies an action unfolding to arrive at mutually satisfactory decisions; but also, an aim, because arranging it affirms the processes of human development in the measurement that is incluyente and takes care of the interests of the multiple parts. A. Principles Keys of the Agreement: All process of agreement must consider a set of principles keys? The agreement is means oriented towards the search of commitments in the decision making for the action, of all the actors who participate around the communal property.